History
1875 - The Squash of the Durfee
Clark [President of the College] ... sought to develop and sustain a continued interest in the new college. Formal professorial lectures and written reports were not enough, he believed. Ingenuity was also required. Unique plant experiments for public display helped lend a notoriety to the practical base from which study arose and proved the practical merit of research in agricultural education. Such experiments attracted onlookers and tempted others to consider agricultural study as a vocation or at the very least to support its continued existence.
One such special project, which many found irresistible and curious, was Clark's famous 'weight lifting squash' experiment. Rigged for display in one of the Durfee propagation pits, a giant chili squash was fitted with a special apparatus. This was to be the first known scientific investigation of the enormous force of plant growth. The squash was planted in July, 1875 in rich compost, a selected flower was hand pollinated in August. Framed by boards and iron bands, the plant could only expand by lifting a weighted platform. This required raising a nine-foot chestnut beam to which assorted weights were progressively added in the form of pipes, castings, an anvil, sand buckets, and hogsheads.
Growing rapidly, the squash was probably critically observed by more people than any squash in history. Many thousands of men, women, and children from all classes of society, of various nationalities, and from all quarters of the earth saw it (by mid-October, more than 10,000 had visited the Plant House). Its fame was such that an offer of ,000 and expenses for a lecture on squashes came to Clark from the Pacific Coast. One enamored professor (D. P. Penhallow) watched it hourly for several days; another (J.H. Seelye) proclaimed he was in total awe. The exhibition turned out to be an amazing demonstration of the power of plant growth. This 'muscular' squash actually lifted in the course of its growing, a weight equal to 4,500 pounds and some days after an accidental cracking of its shell, supported 5,000 pounds. The mighty squash was knotted and scarred by this Herculean effort. Professor Henry W. Parker, first M.A.C. resident chaplain, penned what would be a gruesome epitaph:
Knotty and scraggy and crinkled;
Channeled, constricted, inflated;
Corrugate, plicite and wrinkled;
Tumid, distended, dilated.
Only with great regret did Clark call a halt to the experiment. He even received a warning from his five-year old daughter: 'Papa, when you do let that squash loose, it will go for you.' By November 7, the squash was ready to be 'unharnessed' forever. This was no easy task, for it had to be laboriously cold chiseled free of its iron bounds. It weighed nearly 50 pounds and had a tough rind 3 inches thick. The entire root system was assiduously washed and, when measured, found to be over two thousand feet long. Spectators wondered how such rapid growth and power could proceed silently. No great groans or crunching sounds signaled its progress. It was carefully noted by one vigilant professor that a maximum power was 'secretly' reached just after midnight. A lift of two and one half tons of iron and sand was phenomenal.
A mammoth plaster cast of the celebrated squash was carefully made and placed for exhibit on the second floor of the Botanical Museum. To Clark's great pleasure, throngs continued to bome and have a look; one more interesting object to astound public visitors and students alike.
An attempt to duplicate but improve on the original squash experiment was made in 1987. The 'embellished reenactment' was part of the University's 120th Anniversary celebration. A portable unit made with modern materials and the latest technology and design was constructed to lift a two-ton Deere tractor. Hundreds of spectators gathered in front of the University gymnasium to witness the event. The media was poised, cameras set, a band played, colored balloons were given out, speeches made and backs clapped. Great success was predicted. With much good humor and fanfare, the anxious crowd watched the chambered squash get 'squished' as the rind cracked in about fifty places. Chagrined professors Les Whitney, Stockbridge Dean Jack Denison and grower Tom Beauchesne could only offer the following explanation: they had used the wrong squash (variety), at the wrong time (spring), with the wrong material design (the airtight plexiglass chamber housing the squash trapped in ethylene gas and may have caused premature ripening and a weakened shell). Ceremonial straw hats were humbly tipped in recognition of the past. Vows to return another day were made. This was a time to reflect and go back to the drawing board. The ghost of Colonel William Smith Clark no doubt watched in satisfied approval and knew that there was a lesson here. It seems that we still can learn a great deal about patience, plant growth, and the seasons from our early Aggie instructors.
